Comment on Models in Medicine
نویسنده
چکیده
Allopathy and complementary medicine operate on different principles, and although allopathy is much maligned for some good reasons, it is based on certain sound principles, provided scientists apply strict anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological principles. Recent application of genetic principles in diagnosing and understanding complex clinical entities (precision medicine)[3] has made it even more accurate in diagnosing and treating complicated cases. Certainly, conditions that shortened patients’ lives a few years ago have now made it possible for these children and adults live longer with good quality of life resulting in these individuals playing a useful role in our society. In fact, we have learned much from these patients how to apply treatment modalities without too many side effects. I am not qualified to comment on complementary medicine, except to say that it has a useful role as a preventive medicine and treating chronic conditions. There are other systems of medicine that can be included under the umbrella of complementary medicine other than the ones mentioned by the author that is practiced in different parts of the world. However, they should be subjected to unbiased, rigorous, and accepted scientific methods as Int J Yoga does. Complementary medicine is slowly gaining acceptance by the practitioners of allopathic medicine and there is growing consensus to apply a modified research approach to study its health benefits.[4] I hope that allopathic and complementary medicine can learn from each other to apply holistic, wholesome medical principles to attain a sound mind in a sound body. Comment on Models in Medicine Letter to Editor
منابع مشابه
New Scope for Research in Traditional and Non-conventional Medicine; Comment on “Substitutes or Complements? Diagnosis and Treatment with Non-conventional and Conventional Medicine”
The article takes its cue from models of quantitative research applied to complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) and pinpoints some innovative features in the case at issue (Portugal). It goes on to outline new research scenarios moving beyond the either biomedical or CAM framework.
متن کاملCurrent Models of Investor State Dispute Settlement Are Bad for Health: The European Union Could Offer an Alternative; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”
In this commentary, we endorse concerns about the health impact of the trans-pacific partnership (TPP), paying particular attention to its mechanisms for investor state dispute settlement. We then describe the different, judgeled approach being advocated by the European Commission team negotiating the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, arguing that, while not perfect, it offers si...
متن کاملLocal Research Catalyzes National Surgical Planning; Comment on “Global Surgery – Informing National Strategies for Scaling Up Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa”
In 2015 the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) argued that surgical care is important to national health systems along with the economic viability of countries. Gajewski and colleagues outlined how the Commission’s blueprint has been implemented in sub-Saharan Africa, including two funded research projects that were integrated into national surgical plans. Here...
متن کاملNew Provider Models for Sweden and Spain: Public, Private or Non-profit?; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
Sweden and Spain experiment with different provider models to reform healthcare provision. Both models have in common that they extend the role of the for-profit sector in healthcare. As the analysis of Saltman and Duran demonstrates, privatisation is an ambiguous and contested strategy that is used for quite different purposes. In our comment, we emphasize that their analysis leaves questions ...
متن کاملRisks and Opportunities of Reforms Putting Primary Care in the Driver’s Seat; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
Recognizing the advantages of primary care as a means of improving the entire health system, this text comments on reforms of publicly funded primary health centers, and the rapid development of private forprofit providers in Sweden. Many goals and expectations are connected to such reforms, which equally require critical analyses of scarce resources, professional trust/motivation and business ...
متن کاملHow Useful Are Early Economic Models?; Comment on “Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modelling”
Early economic modelling has long been recommended to aid research and development (R&D;) decisions in medical innovation, although they are less frequently published and critically appraised. A review of 30 innovations by Grutters et al provides an opportunity to evaluate how early models are used in practice. The evidence of early models can be used to inform two types...
متن کامل